• User agency: The self-perceived abilities of users to operate and control their devices.
• Device agency: The capacities that users attribute to their smart devices.

The study introduces four agency profiles that characterize different types of human-smart device relationships:

1. Controller: High user agency, low device agency
2. Collaborator: High user agency, high device agency
3. Victim: Low user agency, high device agency
4. Detached: Low user agency, low device agency

Figure below presents an intuitive idea of the research:

The researcher is validated by conducting an exploratory factorial analysis, tag cloud analysis, and sentiment analysis on survey data to investigate these agency profiles. In this work we examined also how various background variables (such as age, gender, education, and device type) relate to user and device agency.

Key findings include:

1. The type of smart device significantly affected user agency, with household cleaning device users reporting the highest user agency and personal assistant device users reporting the lowest.
2. Most background variables (age, gender, education, professional field, work experience) did not significantly impact user or device agency.
3. The tag cloud analysis revealed distinct patterns of language use associated with each agency profile, providing insights into how users perceive their relationships with smart devices.

This research contributes to the fields of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Information Systems (IS) by offering a framework for understanding the varied ways humans interact with and perceive smart devices. The findings have implications for designing more effective and user-friendly smart device interfaces and experiences. The impact of this paper on human-smart device relationships and related fields includes:

1. Theoretical contribution: The study introduces a novel framework for understanding human-smart device relationships through the lens of user and device agency. This conceptualization provides a new perspective for researchers in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Information Systems (IS).
2. Design implications: The findings can inform the design of smart devices and their interfaces. By understanding different agency profiles, designers can create more user-friendly and effective devices that cater to various user perceptions and needs.
3. User experience enhancement: The research helps in identifying factors that influence user satisfaction and engagement with smart devices. This knowledge can be applied to improve overall user experience.
4. Industry relevance: The study’s insights are valuable for companies developing and marketing smart devices. Understanding user perceptions can guide product development and marketing strategies.
5. Educational impact: The research provides a foundation for educating users about their relationship with smart devices, potentially leading to more informed and empowered consumers.
6. Future research directions: The paper opens up new avenues for research in human-smart device interactions, encouraging further exploration of agency concepts in technology adoption and use.
7. Societal implications: By shedding light on how people perceive and interact with smart devices, the study contributes to broader discussions about the role of technology in society and its impact on human behavior.
8. Methodological contribution: The combination of exploratory factorial analysis, tag cloud analysis, and sentiment analysis provides a multi-faceted approach to studying human-smart device relationships, which can be applied in future studies.

This research has the potential to influence how we design, use, and think about smart devices, ultimately advancing our understanding the human-technology interactions. Overall, you should read this paper for several compelling reasons:

• Novel perspective: The paper introduces a unique framework for understanding human-smart device relationships through the concepts of user agency and device agency. This approach offers a fresh perspective on how people interact with and perceive their smart devices.
• Practical implications and industry relevance: The research has direct applications for designers and developers of smart devices. By understanding different agency profiles, they can create more user-friendly and effective products that cater to various user perceptions and needs. Thus facilitating the development and marketing of smart devices.
• Insight into user experience: The study provides valuable insights into factors that influence user satisfaction and engagement with smart devices. This knowledge can be applied to enhance overall user experience across different types of smart devices.
• Societal impact: The research contributes to broader discussions about the role of technology in society and its impact on human behavior. It helps us understand how people perceive and interact with increasingly prevalent smart devices.
• Methodological innovation: The paper employs a multi-faceted approach combining exploratory factorial analysis, tag cloud analysis, and sentiment analysis. This methodology provides a comprehensive understanding of human-smart device relationships and could be applied in future studies.
• Future research directions: The study opens up new avenues for research in human-smart device interactions, encouraging further exploration of agency concepts in technology adoption and use.

In summary, by reading this paper, you’ll gain a deeper understanding of the complex relationships between humans and smart devices, which is increasingly relevant in our technology-driven world. The insights provided can be valuable whether you’re a researcher, designer, industry professional, or simply interested in how technology shapes our daily lives.

Link to the paper: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16030090

Dataset for the study of Human and Device Agency

The relationship we have with our smart devices is more complex than we think! This research reveals how user and device agency influence our interactions. #TechResearch #HCI #IoT #AI
Share on X

The post The Varieties of Agency in Human–Smart Device Relationships: The Four Agency Profiles appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

Human-computer interaction (HCI) is a multidisciplinary field that explores the interaction between humans and computers, emphasizing especially the design and use of computer technology. Within this domain, the notion of sense of agency, usually defined as the users perceiving their actions as influencing the system, is of crucial importance. Another central notion is that of socio-technical systems, referring to the interplay between social and technical elements. In this work, we delve into users’ perceptions of their interactions with smart devices, drawing insights from a dataset collected during the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020.

The dataset, gathered through an expansive survey, was distributed in professional and personal networks, offers a window into the perspectives of 587 respondents, predominantly highly educated professionals with significant technological familiarity. While the sample’s specificity limits the generalizability of findings, it offers valuable insights into how tech-savvy users perceive their interactions with smart devices, illuminating the nuanced dynamics of HCI within socio-technical contexts.

One of the survey’s notable aspects was its focus on users’ choice of a single smart device to consider throughout their responses. This deliberate framing encourages a deeper exploration of users’ relationships with specific technologies, shedding light on the intricacies of their interactions. For respondents who did not own multiple smart devices, the instruction was to choose their primary device, such as a computer or mobile phone, thus ensuring consistency in the examination of user experiences.

Within the dataset, various dimensions of users’ interactions with smart devices emerged, encompassing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects. Users’ perceptions of agency, defined as their sense of control and influence over the device, are particularly intriguing. Analysis of the dataset reveals diverse manifestations of agency, ranging from feelings of empowerment and efficiency to frustrations stemming from perceived limitations or complexities in device operation.

Moreover, the socio-technical lens allows us to delve deeper into the contextual factors shaping users’ interactions. The dataset captures not only users’ individual experiences but also the broader socio-cultural and technological landscapes influencing these interactions. Factors such as educational background, professional expertise, age, and gender are among the variables examined, offering insights into how these socio-demographic factors intersect with users’ perceptions of smart device interactions.

The dataset’s utilization in previous research endeavors underscores its significance in advancing our understanding of human-computer interaction, user behavior analysis, and agency. By building upon existing research and leveraging the data available, researchers can uncover deeper insights into the complexities of smart device interactions and contribute to the development of more user-centered technologies.

The COVID-19 context during which the data were collected adds another layer of complexity to the analysis. Due to the increased time spent at home and the increase in remote work, the global pandemic catalyzed increased reliance on technology for work, education, and socialization. Understanding users’ interactions with smart devices within this unique context provides valuable implications for designing technologies that accommodate evolving user needs and preferences.

In conclusion, users’ notions of their interactions with smart devices offer a rich tapestry of insights that intersect with key concepts in HCI, including agency and socio-technical systems. Through the analysis of a dataset collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, we gain valuable insights into users’ perceptions, behaviors, and experiences with smart devices within the context of a rapidly evolving technological landscape. This dataset serves as a springboard for further exploration in the field, driving forward our understanding of human-computer interactions in an increasingly digital world.

Where to find more:

• Agency in Human-Smart Device Relationship: A work in progress description of a research done with this dataset

Initial call for collecting the responses

Link to the dataset (Open Access)

https://doi.org/10.3390/data9040056

https://doi.org/10.34894/traony

Main Personal Related Publication

https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16030090

The post Understanding Users’ Experiences of Interaction with Smart Devices: A Socio-Technical Perspective appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

In short, three different fellowships are available:

1. Research Fellowship: For individuals without a PhD who are considering pursuing research studies.
2. PhD Scholarship: For those who wish to pursue a PhD in Switzerland for a period of 3+ years.
3. Post-Doc Scholarship: For individuals with a PhD who are looking to spend one year in Switzerland conducting postdoctoral research.

Please note that all fellowships are intended for individuals who have not previously spent time in Switzerland. Consequently, if you are awarded one of these fellowships, you will be ineligible to apply for the others in the future as you technicaly already have a Phd or Postdoc in Switzerland.

Let’s see each one of them in dettail:

Research Fellowship

Research Fellowships are 12-month programs aimed at highly qualified postgraduate researchers from all academic disciplines. Applicants must have obtained a master’s degree or equivalent by July 31, 2024, except for ETH Zurich applicants, who must meet this requirement by June 30, 2024. Candidates should be born after December 31, 1988. The application requires a support letter from an academic host professor at a Swiss university, including a brief CV (maximum 2 pages), explaining their willingness to supervise and support the research. This letter differs from the confidential recommendation letter also required. Additionally, applicants must submit a research proposal with a defined time frame. Notably, this fellowship is not available to those who already hold a PhD degree

PhD Scholarship

PhD Scholarships are designed for highly qualified PhD students from all academic disciplines, offering funding for 12 to 36 months, extendable in three 12-month increments based on academic progress. Applicants must have obtained a master’s degree or equivalent by July 31, 2024, except for ETH Zurich applicants, who must meet this requirement by June 30, 2024. Eligible candidates should be born after December 31, 1988. The application requires a support letter from an academic host professor at a Swiss university, including a brief CV (maximum 2 pages), detailing their commitment to supervise and support the PhD throughout its duration. If an assistant professor supports the application, a full professor must co-sign the letter. This support letter is distinct from the confidential recommendation letter also required. For PhD studies at a University of Applied Sciences, an additional support letter from a faculty member of the host research university is mandatory. The doctoral degree must be awarded by a research university. A detailed research proposal with a defined time frame is the centerpiece of the application and requires thorough attention.

Post-Doc Scholarship

Postdoctoral Scholarships are 12-month programs aimed at highly qualified early career scientists from all scientific fields. Eligible candidates must have completed their PhD between December 31, 2020, and July 31, 2024 (June 30, 2024, for ETH Zurich), and primarily for those who have not previously studied in Switzerland. The program does not fund sabbaticals. Applicants need a support letter from an academic host professor at a Swiss university, including a brief CV (maximum 2 pages), explaining their willingness to supervise the research. Former PhD mentors and co-directors for co-tutelle PhDs cannot be supervisors. A detailed research proposal with a timeframe is the centerpiece of the application. This scholarship is exclusively for full-time postdoctoral research in Switzerland, prohibiting fieldwork outside the country, and recipients are expected to reside in Switzerland during the grant period. For double doctorates, the date of the first degree is considered. The scholarship is not valid for mixed research conducted partly in Switzerland and partly in another country.

Where to find more Information

The official link of the scholarship contains all the relevant information and is the “GO TO” resources:

• https://www.sbfi.admin.ch/sbfi/en/home/education/scholarships-and-grants/swiss-government-excellence-scholarships.html

Additionally, each country has specific information and details regarding the application procedure, which can be found at the following link.

• https://www.sbfi.admin.ch/dam/sbfi/en/dokumente/2022/07/all-countries.pdf.download.pdf/2023_ESKAS_all_country_contacts_A_to_Z_for_application_documents.pdf

I recommend relying on the official information provided at the link above. The program itself warns about potential scams, and while there are numerous YouTube videos on the topic, some are generated by ChatGPT and others are, for lack of a better word, “dubious.” Here, I share videos from two YouTubers who, in my opinion, offer a reliable overview of the program. From Jama, part 1:

And part 2:

As well as from Aatiya:

My personal suggestions:

If you are interested in applying for a Phd or Postdoc in Switzerland, here are my personal suggestions:

1. Start Early (Paperwork): The application process is deliberately complex to filter out unmotivated candidates. The responsibility for managing the paperwork falls entirely on you, so begin early to ensure you have ample time to complete everything accurately.
2. Start Early (Connections in Switzerland): A critical aspect of the application is obtaining a support letter from a professor in Switzerland who is willing to endorse your candidacy and confirm that your proposal aligns with their and their institution’s research. Building these connections early is essential.
3. Start Early (Your Research Proposal): Develop a meaningful and well-written research proposal as soon as possible. Without a solid proposal, it will be challenging to secure support from a professor. You are solely responsible for writing this proposal. Once you have a polished version formatted according to the required templates, use it as your business card when reaching out to potential professors in Switzerland. Without this document, your communication is likely to be ignored or flagged as spam.

In other words, your commitment and the importance of contacting your potential supervisor as early as possible, armed with all the relevant information, cannot be overstated. This official video from the program provides additional valuable suggestions:

In addition, please note that each professor will not/cam not endorse more then one (or two) candidates per year. Therefore many of the request may simply be not answered.

Can I help you further for your Phd or Postdoc in Switzerland?

It really depends. For this specific grant you (the applicant) are really responsible for doing the heavy lifting as well as for dealing with the dettails. As for the rest, (i) if you believe that you have what it takes for this fellowship, (ii) you fulfill all the requirements, (iii) you have a nice idea to pursue and (iv) it is related to one of the following areas:

1. Internet of Things (IoT): Refers to the network of interconnected devices and objects that can communicate and share data. IoT enables smart homes, industrial automation, and more.
2. Extended Reality (XR): Encompasses virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR). XR technologies blend digital content with the real world, enhancing user experiences.
3. Human Behavioral Informatics: The study of human behavior using data analytics and computational methods. It involves understanding patterns, preferences, and decision-making based on digital interactions.
4. Computer Vision: A field of artificial intelligence that focuses on enabling machines to interpret visual information from images or videos. Applications include facial recognition, object detection, and medical imaging.
5. Language Processing: Also known as natural language processing (NLP), it involves teaching computers to understand and generate human language. NLP powers chatbots, language translation, and sentiment analysis.
6. Security and Privacy: Addresses safeguarding data, systems, and networks from unauthorized access or breaches. It includes encryption, authentication, and privacy-preserving techniques.
7. Big Data Processing: Deals with managing and analyzing large volumes of data. Technologies like Hadoop and Spark enable efficient processing of massive datasets.
8. Distributed Systems: Involves designing and managing systems that run on multiple interconnected computers. Examples include cloud computing, peer-to-peer networks, and distributed databases.
9. Serverless Computing: A cloud computing model where developers focus on writing code without managing servers. Serverless platforms automatically scale resources based on demand.
10. Digital Decision Making: The process of using data-driven insights and algorithms to make informed choices in various domains, such as business, healthcare, and finance.

You can consider dropping me a line! Are you still finishing your thesis instead? These guides may help!

Good Luck!

The post Phd or Postdoc in Switzerland for International Students: On Swiss Government Excellence Scholarships appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

It was a really fun and formative experience where we had the possibility to interact with many colleagues across Europe. We can clearly declare the workshop successful as we had to cap the contribution to only 11 despite the very large contribution that we received (total 22, acceptance rage 50%). If that is not enough for declaring it a success, it also was the largest (most participated) event of the conference.

A big thanks also goes to our sponsors and keynote speaker that stimulated the conversation as well as provided a valuable industrial experience.

Here you can find a set of useful links in case you would like to profit of the outcomes:

• Call for paper for the first workshop on AI Beyond Efficiency
• Modafferi, S., Nuñez, M. J., Lelli, F., & Dalle Carbonare, D. (2022). Artificial Intelligence beyond Efficiency. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3214

Full report can be downloaded here: PDF Version of the report on the workshop

The paper that where discussed are available at the following links:

• Introducing Building Blocks for Industry 4.0, an Analytics Application for the Federated EFPF Platform
  Jose Maria Gonzalez Castro Robert Sanfeliu Prat, Francesc Bonada, Fernando Gigante Valencia
• AI Ethics for Industry 5.0 – From Principles to Practice
  Alexandru Constantin Ciobanu, Gabriela Meșniță
• A Practical Experience of AI Solution Used to Improve Varnishing Process Efficiency in Furniture Manufacturing
  Juan Del Agua, Gabriel Modia
• Industry5.0 and Sociotechnical Theory: Theoretical Underpinnings
  Nicholas Fair
• Relevance of Visualization and Interaction Technologies for Industry 5.0
  Ander Garcia, Marco Quartulli, Igor G. Olaizola, Iñigo Barandiaran
• Teaming.AI: Enabling Human-AI Teaming Intelligence in Manufacturing
  Thomas Hoch, Bernhard Heinzl, Gerald Czech, Maqbool Khan, Philipp Waibel, Stefan Bachhofner, Elmar Kiesling, Bernhard Moser
• On Exploring the Possibilities and the Limits of AI for an Interoperable and Empowering Industry 4.0
  Francesco Lelli
• Artificial Intelligence from Industry 5.0 perspective: Is the Technology Ready to Meet the Challenge?
  Igor García Olaizola Marco Quartulli, Ander Garcia, Iñigo Barandiaran
• Towards Zero-Defect Manufacturing: Machine Selection through Unsupervised Learning in the Printing Industry
  Sotirios T. Spantideas, Anastasios E. Giannopoulos, Nikolaos C. Kapsalis, Angelos Angelopoulos, Stamatis Voliotis, Panagiotis Trakadas
• Towards Industry 5.0 – A Trustworthy AI Framework for Digital Manufacturing with Humans in Control
  Usman Wajid, Alexandros Nizamis, Victor Anaya
• On Developing Human Centric Digital Twins in Industry 4.0 and Beyond
  Akpofure A. Enughwure, Francesco Lelli

As organizer I hope that the connections that the participants build will remain strong, will grow, and will materialize in a tangible advance of the field.

First Workshop on AI Beyond Efficiency: proceedings of the event. #ArtificialIntelligence #workshops #interoperability #Industry40 #BigData #MachineLearning
Share on X

The post AI Beyond Efficiency: note on the event appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

A significant health concern is addiction, a brain disease that can affect anyone. 

The most severe form of substance use disorder (SUD), addiction manifests as a compulsion for a substance or behavior. If addiction is left untreated, it can affect your life in multiple ways: financially, socially, physically, and mentally. 

There are various approaches to fight addiction. You can use traditional psychotherapy, technological methods, or a combination of both.

The Internet of Things (IoT)—a network of Internet-connected devices—is a technological innovation that can help fight addiction and facilitate online recovery. 

As of July 2020, more than 4.5 billion people globally were active Internet users. 

How Can the Internet of Things Help Fight Addiction?

There are various ways the Internet of Things helps to provide online recovery. The Internet of Things offers:

Anonymity

A 2014 study of public attitudes by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found that society is more hostile towards people with substance use disorders (SUD) than those with mental illnesses. This animosity—even among family members or people close to us, makes people uncomfortable seeking help for their SUD. 

Celebrities and other well-known people may feel they can’t be seen seeking help without risking legal trouble or loss of professional standing. That’s one reason why 12-step organizations like Alcoholics Anonymous are anonymous; they can help people recover from addiction without feeling judged.

The Internet of Things helps to maintain the anonymity of those fighting their addiction. You can create an anonymous profile on an online recovery program or anonymously get information on how to get help for addiction. Many 12-step groups have long offered online meetings. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, these online meetings have increased. 

Some addiction professionals also offer online consultations.

Technology-Based Interventions

Traditional methods are still instrumental in addiction recovery. The Internet of Things uses technology-based interventions to supplement and support traditional addiction treatments, not replace them, assist online recovery, and prevent relapse.

Technology-based interventions include:

• Technology-assisted behavioral therapies like individual counseling.
• Education on substance and behavioral addiction.
• Recovery support programs.
• Prevention resources.
• Information resources.
• Wellness monitoring.

The Internet of Things provides access to these interventions through various methods which include:

• Zoom and other types of video conferencing.
• Telephone counseling.
• Web-based text communication, such as chat, emails, and online forums.
• Self-directed therapeutic tools.
• Self-assessment tools.

While such technology-based interventions have little impact on addressing behavioral addictions, it is still significant.

Centralized Prescriptions

Prescription drugs are a concern because of the high abuse, addiction, overdose, and fatalities. Opioids are one of the significant prescription drugs raising a lot of concern. 

Currently, the United States is in the middle of an opioid epidemic. In 2012, there were more than 250 million opioid prescriptions. By 2018, however, the number had decreased to fewer than 170 million prescriptions. Still, 128 people lost their lives every day due to opioid overdose.

The Internet of Things provides prescription monitoring programs that help healthcare officials monitor and control prescriptions. The monitoring programs can also store your prescription history to indicate if you are responsible enough to take the prescriptions home.

Awareness

The Internet is an extensive information resource that young people prefer to brick-and-mortar libraries. The Internet of Things increases awareness of and access to information about addiction recovery, such as:  

• Types of addiction. 
• Causes. 
• Symptoms. 
• Effects. 
• How to get help.  

The Internet of Things is all about communication. You can use various platforms to ask questions, learn about campaigns, present your views, debate, and seek addiction support. Since it’s online, you can have few interruptions when addressing your thoughts and can take your time to give responses.

Monitoring Apps and Use of Wearables

The Internet of Things has also made it possible to fight addiction through artificial intelligence applications and wearables. There are smartphone apps available that create addiction awareness and monitor the chances of relapse.

Wearables have sensors that track your habits. For example, a smartwatch can detect hand movements used in smoking, create awareness of the effects of smoking, and give out reward points when you abstain.

You can also use a wearable breathalyzer to monitor your alcohol consumption and the alcohol content in your body. 

Other wearables offer physical stimuli like a tiny zap to prevent you from engaging in addictive habits.

Final Thoughts

Addiction is a disease characterized by a compulsion to engage in a particular behavior or use a substance. There are various treatment and prevention measures for addiction. Treatment is more effective if you keep up on trends and combine various methods.

The use of the Internet of Things is one of the trends. It will help you fight addiction in various ways, including anonymous online recovery, use of wearables, prescription control, technology-based interventions, and addiction awareness.

About the Author

Patrick Bailey is a professional writer mainly in the fields of mental health, addiction, and living in recovery. He attempts to stay on top of the latest news in the addiction and the mental health world and enjoy writing about these topics to break the stigma associated with them. 

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Pat_Bailey80

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-bailey-writer

The post Can You Use the Internet of Things to Fight Addiction? appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

At a first look these questions look really obvious, to the point that they do not really need to be answered. However, “the obvious” is what most often shapes our behavior without us being aware of it. In particular, our relation with the objects around us, from an anthropological perspective, is what literally allowed us to become humans and helped us in interacting and modifying the surrounding environment.

This study intends to provide an introspective analysis of the way we approach the relationship we have with “things”. As a result, this study may foster a deeper understanding of ourselves and help us in prioritizing what we need, what we want and what we desire in life.

Dr. Heidi Toivonen and me decided to develop a multidisciplinary research on human-smart devices interaction that will try to answer some of these questions in a scientifically sound manner.  

In this respect we need your help! In particular, we are inviting you to take part in a little survey regarding your relationship with smart devices. In taking this survey, you will be able to reflect on how you relate to technology. At the same time you will be contributing to a study that aims to foster a deeper understanding of human interaction with personal smart devices that are becoming a more and more pervasive element of our everyday life. 

We sincerely appreciate your support and collaboration. 

Completing the survey will take you no more than 5 minutes.

Follow this link to the Survey:
Human-Smart Device Interaction

You are also welcome to extend this invitation to anybody you think may be interested in participating in this research. Please share this link and help us spread the voice!

Participate to a scientific #research that will #help #understanding the #interactive #relationships between #humans and smart devices. It takes only 5 minutes of your time! #IoT #HCI #psychology #AI #BigData
Share on X

You can contact us if you have any questions or feedback to share. In addition, if you have done work that you believe is relevant for this research, we look forward to learning from you! 

Thanks for your contribution to science!

The post Human and Smart Device Interaction: Help Wanted appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

In the past few years, the idea of extending the Grid to cover also the remote access, control, management of instrument devices has been explored in a few initiatives. Existing tools lack in generality and require advanced specialized computer science knowledge, thus making them difficult to be broadly adopted in the scientific community. In this paper we present a new open source initiative that is designed to overcome these problems. The Tiny Instrument Element project defines a high level architecture for plugging instruments into the Grid and provides the corresponding skeleton implementation. This lightweight approach, as opposed to existing middleware-based solutions, reduces the effort required to Gridify existing instruments. The paper evaluates the proposed abstraction with a case study from a pervasive computing scenario.

Some relevant Key words: IoT, Internet of things, smart devices, cloud computing, web service, ubiquitous computing, plugin.

In this paper we present the Tiny Instrument Element project showing our proposed novel approach to the integration between instruments and the Grid. Instead of building a new middleware we propose to use a semifinite artifact (i.e., a skeleton software) that can be tailored to meet the requirements of a specific instrument characteristics. This approach not only provides an uniform access to the Gridified instruments but also leaves the flexibility to customize and tune the Tiny Instrument Element for optimal monitoring and control of the instruments. From the case study we have seen that none of the code included in the Tiny Instrument Element release was redundant and that the time required in order to gain a good understanding of the API and the corresponding skeleton was quite small. This supports the idea of template-based software development. The Project has started full open source activities in September 2008. If we exclude our personal activity and the one performed by the case study participants, until the end of 2008, the project website attracted 304 unique visitors (7 Returning many times). The source code was downloaded 40 times and the authors were contacted with positive feedback by 2 users of the community. Whereas the project has been running for a relatively short time, these numbers are promising and show the benefit of a transparent development process to achieve wider dissemination of our research ideas

Full article available at the following link:

The Tiny Instrument Element:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01671-4_27

Read the paper at this link

Your help in sharing the idea is very welcome!

Cite this paper as:

F. Lelli and C. Pautasso The Tiny Instrument Element Project In proc of 4th International Conference on Grid and Pervasive Computing (GPC) , Geneva, Switzerland, May 2009

Related Article:

• The Many Faces of the Integration of Instruments and the Grid

The #tiny Instrument Element for integrating #IoT and #Cloud . An early precursor of #EdgeComputing
Share on X

• Full list of Articles
• Full list of Journal Publications
• Full list of Conference Publications

The post The Tiny Instrument Element appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

Faced with an ever-increasing information flood in a complex and interconnected world, individual knowledge workers are in dire need for support in structuring their personal information space and maintaining fruitful communication and exchange within social networks across organizational boundaries. NEPOMUK develops technical support and stipulates and mobilizes community efforts to realize the Social Semantic Desktop.

This paradigm comprises a set of technical and methodological solutions for:

• supporting the knowledge life cycle via personal knowledge articulation support, embedding in personal work processes, and sharing, exchange and alignment across social networks
• cross-media and cross-application linking and browsing of information items based on standard semantic web data structures, together with un-intrusive metadata support
• knowledge communication within social networks and distributed search and storage to build, maintain, and employ inter-workspace relations in large scale distributed scenarios.

Links:

• Nepomuk in Wikipedia
• EU website of Nepomuk

Some relevant publications includes:

• This is work in progress, just look at the full list of publication here

If this is not what you are looking for, at this link you can see the full list of projects

The post Networked Environment for Personalized, Ontology-based Management of Unified Knowledge (NEPOMUK) appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

The project aims to extend the state of the art of computing grid technologies, by introducing the handling of real-time constraints and interactive response into the existing Grid middleware. Our goal is to build a widely distributed system that is able to remotely control and monitor complex instrumentation that ranges from a set of sensors used by geophysical stations monitoring the state of the earth to a network of small power generators to supply a national power grid. These new applications introduce, to the GRID, requirements that are strongly related to the availability of networks where network classes specifically tuned to address such real-time and highly interactive requests are implemented. One of the main objectives of the project is to verify, with real applications running on existing Grid testbeds over both national and international network infrastructures (e.g. GEANT) the feasibility of a Grid-based remote control of systems requiring real-time response. Data acquired from such instruments typically needs to be stored, analysed on-line to compare the data with a given model or to perform some predictions (e.g. meteorological applications). GRIDCC will integrate the proposed “grid of instruments”, or suitable emulators, into existing Grid infrastructures that will provide the computational and storage power needed for the applications. The reference architecture that is proposed here, along with the related software framework, introduces a new concept, that of a “Virtual Instrument Grid Service” (VlGS), which is a service enabling access, through the Grid, to any instrument by providing an appropriate interface on the instrument side. The architecture combines special-purpose services like virtual control rooms, diagnostic and problem-solving services, data-mining services and tele-presence, which are used to support various instruments with existing grid resources like computational farms and databases.

Links:

• EU website of GridCC

If this is not what you are looking for, at this link you can see the full list of projects

The post Grid Enabled Remote Instrumentation with Distributed Control and Computation (GridCC) appeared first on Francesco Lelli.

Abstract: Industry 4.0 demands a dynamic optimization of production lines. They are formed by sets of heterogeneous devices that cooperate towards a shared goal. The Internet of Things can serve as a technology enabler for implementing such a vision. Nevertheless, the domain is struggling in finding a shared understanding of the concepts for describing a device. This aspect plays a fundamental role in enabling an “intelligent interoperability” among sensor and actuators that will constitute a dynamic Industry 4.0 production line. In this paper, we summarize the efforts of academics and practitioners toward describing devices in order to enable dynamic reconfiguration by machines or humans. We also propose a set of concepts for describing devices, and we analyze how present initiatives are covering these aspects

Recommendations for advancing the state-of-the-art of the (intelligent) interoperability of IoT towards solving use cases from Industry 4.0 include:

• IoT can serve as enabler technology for Industry 4.0 especially if proper “intelligent interoperability” is achieved.
• Consider a deeper collaboration among practitioners and academics for developing a shared set of concepts.
• Consider structured knowledge around devices that does not only focus on sensors and includes actuators, as well.
• Schema.org may be a promising technology that could overcome the intrinsic complexity of the semantic web; however, in the case of IoT, it is still in its initial phases.

Full article available at the following link:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11020036

Your help in sharing the idea is very welcome!

#Interoperability of the Time of #Industry40 and the #InternetOfThings . Consider 'intelligent interoperability' as the next step forward
Share on X

Cite this paper as:

Lelli F. Interoperability of the Time of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things. Future Internet. 2019; 11(2):36.

• Full list of Articles
• Full list of Journal Publications

The post Interoperability of the Time of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things appeared first on Francesco Lelli.